Trump Threatens France With 200% Wine And Champagne Tariffs
BREAKING: Trump threatens 200% tariffs on French wines in response to EU whiskey tax. See how this trade war could empty store shelves and impact your budget.

Morgan Barrons
Mar 14, 2025
The global wine industry faces potential devastation as former President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a staggering 200% tariff on French wine, champagne, and all alcoholic products from European Union countries. This dramatic announcement, made on Thursday, March 13, 2025, marks a significant escalation in the growing trade war between traditional allies. The threat comes in direct retaliation to the European Union's planned 50% tariff on American whiskey, which itself was announced as a countermeasure to Trump's recently implemented 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.
The Announcement and Its Immediate Context
President Trump's declaration came via his Truth Social platform, where he described the European Union as "one of the most hostile and abusive taxing and tariffing authorities in the World" that was "formed for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the United States." His post specifically targeted the EU's planned 50% tariff on American whiskey, calling it "nasty" and threatening immediate retaliation: "If this Tariff is not removed immediately, the U.S. will shortly place a 200% Tariff on all WINES, CHAMPAGNES, & ALCOHOLIC PRODUCTS COMING OUT OF FRANCE AND OTHER E.U. REPRESENTED COUNTRIES." Trump concluded by claiming that "This will be great for the Wine and Champagne businesses in the U.S."
The timing of this threat is particularly significant as it comes just one day after the European Union announced its countermeasures to Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs that went into effect on Wednesday, March 12. These EU retaliatory measures, worth approximately 26 billion euros ($28 billion), are scheduled to be implemented in two stages beginning April 1, 2025. The first stage involves resuming previous tariffs on goods like bourbon, boats, and motorcycles - duties that were initially implemented during Trump's first administration but subsequently suspended in 2022. The European Commission has also announced plans to introduce a "package of new countermeasures" in mid-April, further escalating the situation.
This rapid exchange of tariff threats demonstrates the volatile nature of current international trade relations. Within just 36 hours, what began as a U.S. tariff on steel and aluminum quickly evolved into a broader trade conflict encompassing whiskey, wine, and champagne. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remarked that Trump was "extremely irritated" by the EU's actions, which prompted his latest threat. The speed with which these retaliatory measures are being announced suggests that both sides are taking increasingly hard-line positions.
Historical Context of U.S.-EU Wine Trade Disputes
This is not the first time European alcoholic beverages have been caught in trade disputes between the U.S. and EU. During Trump's first term, similar tariffs led to significant market disruptions. According to the Distilled Spirits Council, a retaliatory tariff imposed in 2018 caused exports of U.S.-made whiskey to drop by 20%. When those measures were lifted in 2021, U.S. whiskey exports to the EU surged by nearly 60%, from $439 million in 2021 to $699 million in 2024.
The current trade tensions must also be viewed in the broader context of Trump's aggressive tariff policies since returning to the White House. In recent weeks, he has implemented 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, as well as an additional 10% tax on goods imported from China. These actions have already provoked retaliatory measures from various countries, including China, which has imposed tariffs of 15% on American chicken, wheat, and corn, and 10% on soybeans, pork, beef, and fruit.
Economic Implications for the Wine Industry
Potential Impact on U.S. Importers and Retailers
The proposed 200% tariff would have devastating consequences for U.S. wine importers, distributors, and retailers who rely heavily on European products. The United States is the largest importer of both wine and champagne globally, with annual wine imports valued at approximately $4.9 billion and champagne exceeding $1.7 billion. If implemented, these tariffs would dramatically increase prices for consumers, potentially making many European wines unaffordable for the average American consumer.
Jeff Zacharia, president of Zachys, a fine wine retailer in Port Chester, New York, noted that 80% of his wine sales come from Europe. He emphasized that there isn't sufficient domestic wine production to fill the gap that would be created by restricted European imports, stating, "This will have a profoundly adverse effect on the entire U.S. wine industry, impacting all facets, including American wineries."
The uncertainty surrounding the situation has already caused disruptions in the supply chain. Zacharia has halted purchases of European wines until the circumstances become clearer, explaining, "It's quite challenging to make plans when, as a business, you lack a clear direction. Our strategies would differ significantly depending on whether the tariff is 200%, 100%, or 10%." Similarly, French shipping company Grain de Sail reported that some winemakers had already canceled upcoming shipments to the U.S. due to anticipated tariffs even before Trump's announcement.
Mary Taylor, owner of a European wine import company, expressed grave concerns about the financial implications. She currently has 16 shipping containers of wine en route to the U.S., which could place her "entire net worth" at risk if the tariffs are implemented. "If I have to cover the costs... I'm finished," she stated. This highlights the immediate financial jeopardy faced by many small businesses in the import sector.
The Complex U.S. Alcohol Distribution System
The structure of the U.S. alcohol distribution system compounds these problems. According to U.S. regulations, alcohol manufacturers cannot sell directly to consumers, bars, or restaurants but must sell to importers or distributors who then supply to retailers. This means approximately 4,000 small American businesses primarily handle the importation of European wines, and these enterprises would be responsible for paying the tariffs. Many could be forced to shut down if unable to pass on the dramatically increased costs to consumers.
Ben Aneff, President of the U.S. Wine Trade Alliance, emphasized that for each dollar U.S. companies pay European producers for wine, American importers, distributors, retailers, and restaurants along the supply chain earn $4.52 in markup. This multiplier effect means that damage to the import sector would ripple throughout the domestic economy, affecting jobs and businesses far beyond just those directly involved in imports.
Consumer Impact and Price Inflation
American consumers would likely face dramatically higher prices for European wines and spirits if the tariffs are implemented. Ronnie Sanders, CEO of Vine Street Imports in New Jersey, remarked, "I doubt customers are ready to pay two or three times the cost for their preferred wine or Champagne." Gab Bowler, head of Bowler Wine in New York, questioned, "What consumer is willing to pay $45 for a bottle of wine that was $15 just a week ago?"
Economics professor Justin Wolfers from the University of Michigan predicted that if the 200% tariffs are implemented, American liquor stores might stop stocking European products entirely, and French wine imports could potentially drop to zero. This would significantly reduce consumer choice and alter the competitive landscape of the U.S. wine market.
Would U.S. Wine Producers Benefit?
Despite Trump's claim that these tariffs would benefit domestic wine producers, industry insiders disagree. John Williams, owner of Frog's Leap, a family-operated winery in Napa Valley, stated, "At first glance, it might appear beneficial, but if you dig deeper, you'll see it's genuinely harmful to our sector at a time when we really can't afford that."
U.S.-produced wines typically have different flavor profiles and price points than their European counterparts, making them imperfect substitutes. Additionally, it's worth noting that Trump's claim about helping the "champagne businesses in the U.S." is technically misleading, as champagne is a legally protected designation that can only be used for sparkling wine produced in the Champagne region of France. American producers can make sparkling wine, but they cannot legally call it champagne.
Chris Leon, who runs Leon & Son, a wine shop in Brooklyn, New York, noted, "I don't think people understand how much the wine industry's infrastructure is dependent on European sales. If you take those funds out of the picture, you diminish the chances of purchasing wines from other regions. You aren't just impacting European wines; you're also limiting the opportunities for Americans to purchase domestic wines."
French and European Response to the Threat
Official Reactions from European Officials
The response from European officials has been swift and resolute. Laurent Saint-Martin, the French delegate minister for foreign trade, stated on social media platform X, "Trump is escalating the trade war he has chosen," adding that "France, together with the European Commission and our partners, is determined to fight back. We will not give in to threats and will always protect our industries."
Olof Gill, a spokesperson for the EU Commission, urged the U.S. to "immediately revoke" the recently imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum and expressed a desire for negotiation to prevent future tariffs. He noted that discussions between EU and U.S. trade officials were being prepared, indicating some willingness to engage diplomatically despite the escalating rhetoric.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had already described the EU's initial retaliatory measures as "strong but proportionate," maintaining that the bloc's actions were justified given the U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. She stated, "We deeply regret this measure," referring to the need for tariffs, and added, "Tariffs are taxes. They are bad for business, and worse for consumers. They are disrupting supply chains. They bring uncertainty for the economy. Jobs are at stake. Prices will go up."
Industry Concerns in Europe
The potential impact on European wine and spirits producers would be significant. Gabriel Picard, who leads the French Federation of Wine and Spirits Exporters, warned that a 200% tariff would be "a devastating blow" to France's alcohol export sector, affecting hundreds of thousands of jobs. He starkly predicted, "Not a single bottle will continue to be exported if 200% tariffs are enforced on products. Exports to the United States would completely cease."
Nicolas Ozanam, director general of the French wine and spirit exporters' federation (FEVS), voiced frustration, stating that exporters are "fed up with being systematically sacrificed over issues unrelated to our own."
The United States represents a crucial market for European wine producers. Italian wine exports to the U.S., particularly prosecco, have tripled in value over the past two decades, reaching 1.4 billion euros ($1.5 billion) last year. The U.S. market for wines and spirits from France is valued at approximately 4 billion euros ($4.3 billion) annually. France exported nearly 27 million bottles of Champagne to the U.S. in 2023, making it the largest market for this premium drink, surpassing even the United Kingdom.
Ettore Prandini, president of Italy's Coldiretti agriculture lobby, expressed concern about the potential for a "dangerous escalation that could lead to a global trade war," noting that "the initial victims will be U.S. citizens who will face increased prices for products, along with farmers." This emphasizes that trade wars ultimately harm consumers and producers on both sides of the dispute.
Trump's Economic Strategy and Broader Trade Policy
The Philosophy Behind Trump's Tariff Approach
President Trump has consistently positioned tariffs as a key element of his economic agenda. He has described the current international trade framework as "stupid trade" and argued that the United States is being taken advantage of by its trading partners. In a follow-up post on Thursday, Trump wrote: "The U.S. doesn't engage in Trade. We have 'Stupid Trade.' The entire world is taking advantage of us!!!"
When questioned about the possibility of his tariff policies triggering a recession, Trump acknowledged to Fox News that "there is a period of transition because what we're doing is very big." However, he and his administration maintain that any short-term economic pain will lead to long-term gains. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described Trump's economic policies as "the most important thing America has ever had," arguing that "these policies produce revenues. They produce growth. They produce factories being built here."
This approach represents a fundamental shift from conventional economic wisdom, which generally views tariffs as harmful to economic efficiency and global prosperity. Trump's assertion that tariffs would be "great for the wine and champagne businesses in the U.S." suggests he sees them as protective measures that can stimulate domestic production, despite industry representatives questioning this logic.
Strategic Targeting of Republican States
A notable aspect of this trade dispute is how both sides appear to be targeting products from politically significant regions. The EU's tariffs specifically target products from Republican-led states, such as Kentucky bourbon, while Trump's threatened wine tariffs would disproportionately affect France and Italy. Commerce Secretary Lutnick highlighted this political dimension when he questioned, "Why are Europeans targeting Kentucky bourbon and Harley Davidson motorcycles? It's simply disrespectful."
The targeting of politically sensitive products has become a common tactic in trade disputes, designed to create maximum political pressure on decision-makers. This suggests that both sides are not only engaged in economic calculations but also political maneuvers.
Market and Economic Reactions
The uncertainty caused by the escalating trade tensions has already affected financial markets. The S&P 500 index fell into correction territory, down more than 10% from its peak just three weeks prior. This market reaction reflects investors' concerns about the potential economic disruption from an expanding trade war.
Specific alcohol-related stocks have also been impacted. Following Trump's announcement, shares of European alcohol firms experienced notable declines, with companies like Pernod Ricard and Rémy Cointreau seeing their stock values drop.
The Distilled Spirits Council, representing the U.S. spirits industry, called the EU's announcement to reimpose heightened tariffs on American whiskey "deeply disappointing." Its president and CEO, Chris Swonger, urged both sides to reach a resolution, stating, "We encourage President Trump to negotiate a spirits agreement with the E.U. to restore zero-for-zero tariffs, which would create jobs in the U.S. and stimulate production and exports for the American hospitality industry. We prefer toasts over tariffs."
FAQs About Trump's 200% Wine Tariff Threat
When would these tariffs take effect if implemented?
While Trump did not specify an exact implementation date for the 200% tariff on European alcoholic beverages, his announcement suggests it would follow shortly if the EU does not remove its 50% tariff on American whiskey. The EU's tariffs are scheduled to begin on April 1, 2025, so Trump's retaliatory measures could potentially be implemented shortly after that date.
How would the proposed tariffs affect prices for consumers?
A 200% tariff would triple the import cost of European alcoholic beverages. For example, a $15 bottle of Italian prosecco could increase to $45 at retail. Premium products like French champagne would see even more dramatic price increases, potentially making them unaffordable for many American consumers who currently enjoy these products.
Could American wine producers replace European imports?
Industry experts and American wine producers themselves have expressed skepticism about this possibility. U.S. wines typically have different flavor profiles and often higher price points than their European counterparts, making them imperfect substitutes. Additionally, certain products like champagne can legally only be produced in the Champagne region of France, meaning there is no direct American substitute.
What happened last time tariffs were imposed on European alcohol?
During Trump's first term, similar tariffs led to significant market disruptions. American whiskey exports to the EU dropped by approximately 20% when the EU imposed retaliatory tariffs. When those tariffs were lifted in 2021, exports rebounded dramatically, growing nearly 60% from $439 million to $699 million by 2024, demonstrating the negative impact that tariffs had on trade.
Who actually pays these tariffs?
Contrary to some perceptions, tariffs are initially paid by the importing companies, not by the exporting countries. In the case of wine and spirits, approximately 4,000 small American businesses handle European wine imports and would be responsible for paying these tariffs. These costs are typically then passed on to distributors, retailers, restaurants, and ultimately consumers through higher prices.
Is this tariff threat likely to be implemented, or is it a negotiating tactic?
Based on historical patterns, some industry observers believe this could be a negotiating tactic. Mark O'Callaghan of Exit9 Wine & Liquor in Clifton Park, New York, commented, "Things change by the hour, right?" noting that Trump has previously threatened tariffs that were later modified or not implemented. However, the administration's broader commitment to using tariffs as a policy tool suggests this threat should be taken seriously.
Final Thoughts: A Trade War With No Winners
President Trump's threat to impose 200% tariffs on French wine, champagne, and other European alcoholic beverages represents a significant escalation in trade tensions between the United States and the European Union. This move comes in response to the EU's planned 50% tariff on American whiskey, which itself was a retaliatory measure against Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs. The rapid exchange of tariff threats highlights the volatile nature of current international trade relations.
The potential economic impacts of these tariffs would be far-reaching. U.S. importers, distributors, and retailers of European wines face existential threats to their businesses, while consumers would likely encounter dramatically higher prices and reduced choices. European producers, particularly in France and Italy, could lose access to their largest export market, affecting hundreds of thousands of jobs.
As the Irish Whiskey Association aptly stated, "There is no winner in a trade war." Both European and American industry representatives have emphasized that trade wars ultimately harm businesses and consumers on both sides. While there remains potential for diplomatic resolution through negotiations, the increasingly confrontational rhetoric suggests a high risk of further escalation.
The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether this trade dispute can be resolved or whether it will expand into a broader global trade war with far-reaching economic consequences. As additional tariffs are scheduled to take effect in April from both sides, the alcohol industry—along with consumers who enjoy imported spirits and wines—will be watching developments closely, hoping that cooler heads will prevail.